Yesterday, I wrote a fairly upbeat postabout the upcoming Food Day Event. This isn't FOODday, the weekly
food specific insert our local newspaper publishes. Nor is it the
longstanding Oxfam event designed to raise awareness about world
hunger. No, this an event modeled on Earth Day – National Day of
Awareness – Local events, national message.
I feel conflicted about this. This has
nothing to do with raising awareness about food's origins - that kind
of consciousness raising is good. Nationally, heroes and inspirations
such as Marion Nestle and Morgan Spurlock will be participating.
Locally, the Oregon non-profit organization, Farmers Against Hunger,
is leading the local charge for Food Day. How could one even be in
opposition to a group called Farmers Against Hunger. It would be like
being against pictures of kittens on the Internet.
![]() |
| How Dare you Enjoy That! |
My problem, well with this event
anyway, is its sponsor, the Center for Science in the Public
Interest. CSPI has very little to do with science – they don't do
scientific research in the traditional peer reviewed fashion, they
cull info from published studies and tend to cherry pick information,
and they have been accused by former researchers of being less than
scientific. Their publications are usually alarmist and occasionally
speculative. CSPI is a lobbying group, which isn't a problem, people
and organizations have a right to petition our government, except
they don't even call themselves lobbyist, they imply science and
rational thought when they are about as sciencey as Scientologists.
Just to back up a little bit, CSPI was
founded in 1971 by a group of former Naderites. This wasn't the
post-Gore recalcitrant Ralph Nader, this was the viable and crusading
Unsafe at Any Speed, Ralph Nader. At their best, CSPI has
lobbied for consistent labeling on products, so that low fat
and heart healthy mean something other than marketing slogans.
At their worst they have been inconsistent in labeling – with
alcohol they feel less information for consumers is better, they,
like a lot of 'experts' were for Trans-fats before they were
hysterically against them and they unabashedly want to tax butter,
soda and 'junk food' (BTW- pizza is junk food to them). CSPI in their
righteousness mirrors a self-serving Andrew Breitbart whose corner
cutting and truthiness are justified because no one understands as
well as they do. This organization has consistently presented skewed information about movie popcorn, Chinese take out, caffeine and
beer – better to scare and alarm consumers*. Need more proof: NPR
loves to quote them as serious unbiased watchdogs.
I find the CSPI to be scare mongers,
food scolds and anti-calorie rather than pro-healthy diet. They are
just as bad as all the other voices out there that tell you food is
unsafe, it's hard to prepare & who has the time anyway, food
doesn't sustain life it kills you, it is joyless. I like butter and
the occasional cocktail. I like chips and fries. I am not afraid of
these foods - they don't
need to be taxed, regulated and treated like forbidden fruit –
there are healthy and unhealthy diets, not individual foods. Weight
gain is more than calories-in calories-out strategy, let's learn
about healthy diets. If we talk about taxing foods, specific foods
let's talk about where that money will go to -safe, clean parks, bike
lanes, exercise initiatives, because levying a surcharge against the
select foods CSPI doesn't like - won't make one person skinny.
Monday's Food Day is not the first time
CSPI has tried to launch a National Day of Awareness – originally
rolled-out in the mid-70s the project lost momentum and funding. CSPI's
founder Michael Jacobson in an interview with the Washington Post
wondered where the locavore/Slow Food/organic movements would be
today if only Food Day had kept pace with Earth Day. Probably even in
worse shape. Fortunately, people like Carlo Petrini, Michael Pollan,
Spurlock and Nestle took time to educate people about making more
educated food choices instead of scolding, scaring and blackballing
select foods.
Enjoy the day, be mindful of the
sponsor.
*CSPI's In-house food policies are so strict
that founder Jacobson once reportedly intended to get rid of the
office coffee machine—until one-third of his 60 employees
threatened to quit.

No comments:
Post a Comment